Inequalities
in the Information Society: Problems and Solutions (page
1 of 2)
By Abdul Alkalimat,
University of Toledo
It is a great
pleasure to be here speaking at this conference. We have come as
a delegation from Toledo, Ohio--faculty and students, from the campus
and the community. Our hope in coming to this conference was to
meet new friends and exchange information that can contribute to
a new era of cooperation based on these new technologies that we
have, and a new political understanding that we so desperately need.
We would like to extend a hand of friendship to everyone here and
declare our commitment to build relationships of cooperation and
reciprocity, of sharing what we have and joining any struggle we
can to stop the evils of exploitation and build a better world for
us all.
Will all of
the Toledo spiders please stand up? After this session we will have
a table in the IDICT booth, and the spiders will be there to answer
and ask questions and pass out free our CDs and other publications
so you can be more familiar with our work. We would like to learn
about your work as well.
We work in a
lower income inner city African American community in the post-industrial
midwestern heartland of the USA. Toledo is a city of over 300,000
in a metropolitan area of 500,000. We are located one hour south
of Detroit, 2 hours west of Cleveland, and 3 hours east of Chicago.
We are in the heartland of the USA. The 2000 census figures indicate
the city is 23% African American and 6% Latino. (The US census often
reports these figures on Blacks and Latinos as if they are separate
and not overlapping population categories.) Using the latest census
figures the household income in Toledo was $24,819 (USA = $30,056,
25% more than Toledo), with a full 20% of the population below the
official government poverty level. We are the home of the Jeep Cherokee
for state of the art auto production, Libby glass, and the global
headquarters of the Dana Corporation - auto parts and supplies are
produced by over 70,000 employees, in 300 facilities in 34 countries
with sales of over $10 billion. In Toledo we have global capitalists,
workers, and poor people being thrown out of industrial society.
In Toledo, Ohio,
we are at the edge of industrial decline, a place where corporate
decisions to maximize profit are life and death questions for entire
communities. The old assembly line mass production capitalism created
a solid foundation for the Toledo economy and drew to its neighborhoods
immigrants from the US rural south and from Mexico, and from many
parts of Europe, especially Germany, Hungary, and all of Eastern
Europe. In the Great Depression the workers and their families launched
a mass strike in 1936, the Auto-Lite Strike, and that led to the
Great Sit Down Strike in Flint Michigan organized by the same activists.
This strike wave that started in Toledo led to the Congress of Industrial
Organizations, the CIO, and a new era of labor militancy was born.
Now this industrial system is being transformed and the people who
fed their families from the assembly line are now being abandoned
at the beginning of this new information era Our current social
crisis far exceeds the 1930's and goes back to the mid 19th century
origins of industrial capitalism discussed by Marx and Engels. This
is the historic context for our meeting this week, and the material
conditions that require our intervention in history.
The world we
live in is not the world of yesterday, and it is not the world of
tomorrow, it is the world of today. This statement has special meaning
as we begin a new century, as we begin the information revolution,
as we face the end of the industrial system we have struggled in
for all of the 20th century. The history of every country is the
history of people fighting for a better life, sometimes in the realm
of science, sometimes in the realm of politics, and always in the
realm of culture we have been fighting for a better life. Our paper
is about this current moment, our need to intervene in history to
understand and change the beginning of a new kind of society, the
information society based on electrical digital technology.
There are two
general themes of this talk. The first is to discuss key aspects
of the information society, how it is different from industrial
society, how it transforms the class polarities of industrial society
into polarities defined by informational parameters. Then, secondly,
we will attempt to suggest how we might move forward given the polarities
we face. How do we intervene in this historical process of the birth
of the information society to advance the cause of democracy, peace
and justice? What is the future potential of this information society
for achieving the strategic goal of human freedom?
The
revolution in technology
The information
society is being born via a fundamental transformation in technology,
digital electronic technology, hence many think of it as a revolutionary
experience. This is a profound belief that we need to discuss. Are
we in the midst of a revolutionary process? This is a key theoretical
question with great practical implications. The word revolution
means fundamental transformation, a change in the basic nature of
society and the conditions for life itself. There can be many kinds
of revolutions, revolution in music, in poetry, in all aspects of
human activity, but there is a special sense in which the word revolution
is used to define a new kind of society, the beginning of a stage
of human history. It is in this latter sense that we are experiencing
a revolution today - a fundamental transformation of the most important
features of society, its basic character is being transformed. This
is not merely a question of what is happening in a particular place,
as clearly there are vast regions of the world without such technology.
But, where these things exist so exists the global power that determines
the well being of all of us, the forces we interact with whether
we know it or not.
The machine
driving this process is the computer, a tool that takes electricity
to its highest level far exceeding being merely raw energy driving
the moveable parts of machines. Now electricity is the environment
in which information can be stored, manipulated, and presented.
The first computer was probably the abacus created 5000 years ago.
But the first computer to run on more than human energy was a steam
driven machine created by Charles Babbage (1791 - 1871), a contemporary
of Charles Darwin (1809 - 1882) and Karl Marx (1818 - 1883). Here
we can observe a revolutionary moment in history - revolution in
social science (Marx), revolution in natural science (Darwin), and
a revolution in technology (Babbage). The full electrical revolution
began when transistors became part of the process in 1948, followed
by integrated circuits placed on silicon chips leading to the emergence
of modern computing in the 1970's.
The computer
has been linked with telephones and satellites to create networks
for communication. This new global network is called the World Wide
Web (WWW) and the Internet. For the first time humanity has the
possibility of instantaneous communication of text, graphics (still
and video), and sound on a global level.
At the base
of this global network of computers and the Internet is the digital
code. In fact we can say that the heart of the revolutionary process
creating the information society is the universal digital code,
a code that can take all forms of information, text, image and sound,
and in a series of digits, 0's and 1's, store this information and
access it at any time and any place on the network. It is an interesting
fact that much like the mid nineteenth century this is a time of
fundamental revolutionary action on all levels: the technological
revolution of the digital code for computer based communication
of all forms of information, and the scientific revolution of the
DNA code for life including the Human Genome. We are in search of
such clarity about the nature of the social revolution that is happening
now, and will surely be more and more obvious in the decades to
come.
This use
of the universal digital code is made possible by the rapid
expansion of the capacity of the micro-chip based on Moore's
law, an observation made in 1965 by an engineer Gordon Moore,
co-founder of Intel, that every 18 months the capacity of the
microchip doubles and the price is reduced by 50%. This is what
has made the rapid explosion of opportunities like teleconferencing,
DVD digital recording of movies and MP3 recording of music,
etc. Given this explosion of technological capacity, there has
been a massive investment, sometimes based on discovery and
innovation but often based on a hunch and a gamble.
The rapid
adoption of technologies of the Internet and the www is clear.
In 1997 there were 40 million people on line representing about
1% of the world population, while by 2002 there were 544 million
people on line making up 9% of the total population. But this
general figure is quite polarized as Europe and North American
make up 65% of online population, and the per cent goes up to
90% if you add the Asian countries of both parts of China (46
million), Japan (49 million), South Korea (22 million), Australia
(10 million) and India (5 million).
Via this
development in societies all over the world we have seen the
development of three kinds of geospatial centers emerge:
-
Technopoles:
specialized urban areas based on the new technologies
-
De-linked
areas with virtually no connectivity, and
-
Dual
centers in which some have high connectivity and others are
isolated.
The majority
of humanity is coming under the influence and control of the
technological productivity of the technopoles - they invent
the machines and write the software the corporate, military
and governments use. On the other hand, most of us live in dual
environments of cities or de-linked if in most rural areas of
the world. In fact, in the third world of Asia, Africa, and
Latin America the Internet and web based technologies are dominated
by the NGO's of the dominate countries of Europe and North America,
therefore much technology in Asia, Africa, and Latin America
does not represent indigenous capacity building but the infrastructure
of globalization. It is in this context that we have to debate
the issue of development - to what extent an appendage of the
global system of capital, and to what extent a freestanding
economic base for the home market. More
>>
|