The
Coming Job Glut: Expanding Work in The High-Tech Sector
(page 2 of 3)
By Ivan Handler
Chicago Third Wave Study Group
Infoglut
The retrieval
of information thus depends upon the classification of data.
This is where things start becoming even more problematic. Information
is usually classified based on the current classification models
used when the data is entered. In many cases these classifications
are not useful when the information is opened up to larger circles
of requestors. What happens then? Either a large project must
be undertaken to reclassify information so it is useful to the
larger circle. Or workers must be retrained to do the reclassification.
Or special expensive software may be designed or purchased that
purports to do this automatically. Or, most likely, a combination
of all three.
Now let's
say the information is successfully reclassified, and the corporation
is even more efficient. This means that even more information
is being produced at an even faster rate. As competitors catch
up, more pressure is put on the corporation to integrate more
information into its systems and to make it available to even
larger audiences. This causes another problem with reclassification,
which leads to even faster information production, and so on.
Sheer volumes
of data can also force the need to refine classification data.
As more data is entered into a system, more and more data falls
under the same classes. This may not be a problem for people
who know unique combinations of elements that can be used to
find what they need. But it is a problem for the majority who
do not have that knowledge. In any event reclassification becomes
necessary and users must be trained in the new system. Or the
corporation must rely on automated classification software that
can processes millions of data elements, but cannot understand
human language. In some circumstances, this means critical data
can be lost unless someone can correctly deduce the right combination
of factors to use in a query. Anyone who has used an internet
search engine to look for obscure data has experienced this
first hand.
With the
internet becoming not only the common means of exchanging information,
but the common repository for information, this cycle builds
up even faster since any time anything is added to a repository,
some portion of it will be opened up to the internet. There
are two responses to this situation: 1) build new search/classification
software to handle the increasing load and 2) build new information
specialty businesses or business units that can provide information
very quickly in a very narrow range of topics. The latter expansion
is referred to as both horizontal and vertical growth. Horizontal
growth refers to expansion into new areas and vertical growth
implies deeper expansion into existing areas.
Of course
these solutions must be short lived. Since no matter how efficient
the search software is, when enough new information is added
to a repository, searches that produced short lists of possible
resources start to produce lists that get larger and larger
until the searches become useless and must be refined. The same
goes for information specialists. Sooner or later what started
as a small niche will be seen as overly general and unmanageable
so that newer smaller niches will need to be created. Since
the whole dynamic of the information revolution is to produce
more and more information with increasing acceleration, these
solutions will become obsolete faster and faster.
While lots
of salespeople who sell the latest search/classification software
based on the latest computational linguistic techniques will
claim that they will have this problem solved within a few short
software generations. This does not seem very credible to me.
The whole history of software is riddled with these overly optimistic
claims that never come true. In part this is because it is easy
to make large strides in software when you enter new territory.
This breeds a simplistic optimism that all problems will turn
out to be this simple, so that a linear extrapolation of the
progress that has been made yields fantastic claims for the
near future. As in all technical fields, the first few remarkable
bursts of activity usually yield to long years of slow and uncertain
progress.
Infoglut
causes Jobglut
The effect
this dynamic has on employment is what we want to look at now.
In this case it should be obvious that as the information management
problem grows exponentially, the need for high-tech workers
grows right along with it.
-
More
software engineers and computer scientists are needed who
know the latest technologies to create more powerful software.
-
More
software integrators are needed to implement the software
at corporate sites.
-
More
information specialists are needed to specialize in particular
information niches.
-
More
web designers are needed to build the web sites for all
of this activity.
-
More
support staff are needed to provide technical support for
the expanding infrastructure and so on.
The more
high-tech workers that are found, the more information that
is produced giving rise for the need for even more high-tech
workers to help manage the resulting information explosion.
As automation erodes the need for low skill labor, it is dramatically
increasing the need for high-tech labor.
Finally,
the larger the size of the high-tech labor force, the more money
they have to spend on goods and services. In turn this stimulates
the economy, which translates into more information expansion,
which re-enforces the rapid expansion of the high-tech labor
sector. The above arguments can be summarized in the following
diagram:
Blue and
red bubbles represent conditions, arrows are the responses,
and yellow bubbles label the responses. The arrows imply the
response contributes to the condition its arrowhead touches.
The problem
is that the industrial culture we are leaving has built up a
political structure that functions as a barrier against bringing
those at the bottom who need family sustaining jobs to the corporations
who need more high paid workers to manage the information crisis
they are creating.
Information
and Technology Cycles
So how fast
is the automation/information-production cycle? Having no direct
statistics, the best indicator that I am aware of is in the
growth of technology. There are several indicators that are
consistent with the above views.
Moore’s
law invented by Joe Moore states that roughly every 18 months
the processing power of computer cpu’s (central processing
units) will double. While there is some suspicion that this
will eventually end, it is not clear when. It has held true
now for at least 20 years. Interestingly enough, according to
Jon William Toigo in the May 2000 issue of Scientific American:
“Many corporations find that the volume of data generated
by their computers doubles every year. Gargantuan databases
containing more than a terabyte—that is, one trillion
bytes—are becoming the norm …(4)” This means
information appears to be growing in some sectors faster than
a major element of information processing technology, processor
power.
The concrete
ways Moore’s law contributes to information production
are:
-
The
workstations that people use respond to the same software
faster, allowing more information to be generated in the
same time.
-
The
workstations that people use can run more sophisticated
software at the same speed of less sophisticated software,
which can in turn generate even more information, much of
it of greater complexity.
-
Servers
(computers that handle large amounts of data) can process
information faster.
-
Network
bandwidth (the speed that data can travel between computers
on a network such as the internet) increases. Routers, switches,
hubs and network cards, the basic drivers of networks, all
use cpu’s of some type to do their work. In addition,
this last item is not only dependent on Moore’s Law.
It is also dependent upon other technologies such as fiber
optic technology which is also advancing at a dizzying rate.
As bandwidth increases, more information can be delivered
to more servers and workstations faster, facilitating the
overall growth of information flows.
“Cyberimperialism”.
In order to create chips with higher and higher component densities
(this is what makes Moore’s law work), newer, more sophisticated
and much more expensive factories must be built. It now costs
over $1 billion to build a state of the art chip factory. In
order to make a profit on the chips before the factory becomes
obsolete, more chips must be produced and sold than previous
generations. The way to make sure that happens is to create
new mass marketable devices in ever expanding commercial and
consumer markets. So we now have not only PalmPilots, we have
all kinds of computer game devices, computerized dolls, soon
computerized kitchen devices such as internet enabled refrigerators
and microwave ovens. (No joke. They maintain automated lists
of groceries and can automatically reorder from your net-based
grocer when supplies are low.) The only way to preserve profits
is to expand markets into newer untouched areas of human culture.
This expansion also adds to the information explosion.
Information
architectures are also changing. This is also driven by the
need to handle more information faster. There are really four
main generations of computer architecture(5):
1. Batch
processing. This mode of processing lasted from the late 40s
to the early 70s. In this mode, punched cards were submitted
to a computer operator who ran each program one at a time.
2. Mainframe
based transaction processing. This started in the late 60s
and still exists in most large corporations though it started
loosing dominance in the early 80s and has been more or less
stable ever since the 90s.
3. Client/Server
architecture. This started in the mid-80s and is probably
the dominant architecture today. While client/server applications
are still being deployed, they are not growing as fast as
they once were due to the next item.
4. Modern
multi-tiered web-based architectures. This is really a hodge-podge
of many different architectures that has taken off starting
in around 1997 with the growth of commercial web sites.
While the
effect of the spread of new architectures is hard to quantify,
it does indicate a new faster information growth trend is now
underway.
New
Employment Niches
So far we
have been talking primarily about employment that directly serves
corporate needs. The growth of the Internet is also giving rise
to potential niches serving consumers who use the net, the majority
of whom are high-tech workers because of their familiarity with
the net as well as the amount of money they have to spend.
Consumers,
whether they are working for corporations in a particular capacity
or just out for themselves, are finding it increasingly difficult
to find what they want on the internet. Portal sites such as
Yahoo, Excite, Netscape, AOL, MSN and others are one response.
These sites are attempting to become the entrance points for
all users on the web, providing them with access to both search
engines and large indices that help users find what they are
after. Shopping portals such as My Simon have also arisen. These
sites will allow a consumer to find goods and services offered
by a generally large set of online businesses and to comparison
shop right then and there. The affect this is having on prices
and what the outcomes will be is another very interesting phenomena
to watch.
On the other
hand, none of the search engines or portal sites can account
for any more than about 20% of all of the web pages available.
It is still quite common to find “dead urls” (web
addresses that no longer exist) when using these sites to find
information. As a result more specialized sites are evolving
such as Slashdot for the heavy techie or Arts and Letters Daily
for those interested in literature, philosophy and opinion.
Just as Usenet has provided thousands of sites to host specific
discussions, “electronic communities” are forming
everywhere with all kinds of specific focuses. In fact the latest
dot.com consultants are advising all businesses to transform
themselves into electronic communities where consumers interact
with each other as well as the corporations workforce to not
only buy and sell products, but to actually design and build
products.
Another
important development is arising and that is for “micro
payments”. This is a combination of technology for ecure
buying and selling and arrangements with the financial industry
to allow for sites to make money off small payments that may
be as low as a tenth of a penny. When this technology becomes
ubiquitous on the net, we will probably see a shift in many
sites from “free” information (with lots of advertising)
to sites with little or no advertising but small fees charged
for each access. When you realize that some estimates indicate
that there will be over a billion users on the net by the end
of 2005 or sooner, you can see the reason for micropayments.
More >>
|