| 
               Assessing 
                cy.Rev:  
                A Commentary on Stalin's Opposition, Central Plans and Utopian 
                Premises (page 
                1 of 3) 
                By Louis Proyect 
               The Chicago 
                area computer programmers and activists who decided to start a 
                new journal called cy.Rev chose wisely to publish on the World 
                Wide Web of the Internet. This is a great example of merging medium 
                and the message after the fashion of Marshall McLuhan. The driving 
                force behind this project is Carl Davidson, a leader of SDS in 
                the 1960s and a writer and editor of the Guardian Newspaper during 
                the 1970s. In recent years Davidson has done computer consulting 
                for non-profit groups and unions in the Chicago area and believes 
                passionately in the new technology. 
              Davidson and 
                others organized themselves into the Chicago Third Wave Study 
                Group which started cy.Rev in an effort to promote their ideas 
                in "cyberspace". They dubbed themselves "Third 
                Wave" because the futurists Alvin and Heidi Toffler were 
                a strong influence on their vision of socialism. The Tofflers 
                have been promoting the Third Wave theory like missionaries for 
                years. Only since the arrival of personal computing and the Internet 
                has "Third Wave" theory achieved the kind of high profile 
                the Tofflers have sought for it over the years. 
              What exactly 
                is the Third Wave? Put simply, the theory states that there are 
                three important "waves" in social history: (1) rural 
                societies based on agriculture, (2) urban societies that emerged 
                with the industrial revolution, and (3) the information-based 
                world in which we currently reside. The United States is in the 
                throes of this third microchip-inspired wave. Most of its difficulties 
                are the fault of its inability to migrate smoothly out of the 
                "Second Wave" of dying smokestack industries into the 
                promised land of computer networks and knowledge-based industries. 
              Newt Gingrich 
                is a booster of the "Third Wave." So is Wired Magazine, 
                a cosponsor of high-tech conferences with the Georgia reactionary. 
                Davidson and the editors of cy.Rev want to cut the ties between 
                "Third Wave" theory and its right-wing supporters and 
                enlist in on behalf of a technologically supercharged version 
                of market socialism. Not surprisingly, they blame the problems 
                of traditional Marxism as having been too closely connected with 
                "Second Wave" thinking. Such thinking gave birth to 
                Stalinist bureaucracies where investments in heavy industry took 
                priority over the technology of the information revolution. 
              There is a 
                strong green emphasis in cy.Rev which argues that "Third 
                Wave" socialism can also help to alleviate the environmental 
                crisis. Both "Second Wave" capitalism and socialism 
                have caused environmental degradation, despite the best intentions 
                of governments east and west: "This feature of industrial 
                society is not a problem of the distant future. It is the 'dirty 
                little secret' of today's world standing behind the rising the 
                conflict between North and South. The truth is that we cannot 
                have economic equality among nations based on today's levels and 
                standards. If every country in the world were organized on just 
                the same level and just the same types of production and consumption 
                that are 'enjoyed' in the either the U.S., or Europe, or Japan, 
                or even the former Soviet Union, the resulting polluted biosphere 
                would render the globe uninhabitable for humans." 
               
                 
                  Rejecting 
                    the development model of the former USSR, cy.Rev places itself 
                    squarely in the market socialism camp: 
                 
               
               
                 
                  "In 
                    our view of socialism, we affirm the entrepreneurial spirit, 
                    the motivating energy of the market and the right of individuals 
                    to become wealthy through the private ownership of the capital 
                    they have helped to create. At the same time, we fundamentally 
                    reorder priorities in how both property and capital is defined. 
                    While both personal property and capital may still be owned 
                    by individuals. we no longer see ownership as an absolute 
                    power. Property, especially productive property in the form 
                    of capital, is to be seen primarily as a social power relation 
                    that can be guided and regulated, just as other power relations 
                    are regulated for the common good of society. Incomes are 
                    also subject to progressive taxation." 
                 
               
                 
                  According 
                    to cy.Rev, the biggest obstacle to a smooth transition to 
                    "Third Wave" socialism in the United States is the 
                    stubborn tendency of jobs to disappear in capitalist society. 
                    They draw attention to studies such as Jeremy Rifkin's "The 
                    End of Work" and Stanley Aronowitz and William DiFazio's 
                    "The Jobless Future" which attempt to explain this 
                    problem. Both books take note of the replacement of blue-collar 
                    jobs through automation. Rifkin's solution is to create more 
                    jobs in the non-profit world of museums, schools and parks 
                    and the like. Davidson sympathies lie with the socialists 
                    Aronowitz and DiFazio (Aronowitz has recently joined the editorial 
                    board of cy.Rev). Reduction of work hours, regulation of capital 
                    to prevent capital flight, quality education with an accent 
                    on computer skills, a guaranteed income and a new research 
                    agenda geared to human needs rather than private profit are 
                    some of the solutions they propose in "The Jobless Future." 
                     
                  In addition 
                    to promoting this vision of "Third Wave" socialism, 
                    cy.Rev also includes useful articles that cover the proliferation 
                    of high-technology into the world of non-profits, unions, 
                    educational institutions and the progressive movement. One 
                    of the more interesting articles appears in the premier issue 
                    is "SoliNet: Electronic Conferencing for the Trade Union 
                    Movement" by Marc Belanger of the Canadian Union of Public 
                    Employees. SoliNet is a public computer conferencing system 
                    open to the labor movement and its allies with approximately 
                    1500 users. According to Belanger, it probably the world's 
                    only such system owned and operated by a union. 
                  Cy.Rev 
                    is a refreshing alternative to the "Neo-Luddism" 
                    of Kirkpatrick Sale or the anti-technology jeremiads of Neil 
                    Postman. Postman complains in "Technopoly" that, 
                    "In automating the operation of political, social and 
                    commercial enterprises, computers may or may not have made 
                    them more efficient but they have certainly diverted attention 
                    from the question whether or not such enterprises are necessary 
                    or how they might be improved. A university, a political party, 
                    a religious denomination, a judicial proceeding, even corporate 
                    board meetings are not improved by automating their operations. 
                     
                  They are 
                    made more imposing, more technical, perhaps more authoritative, 
                    but defects in their assumptions, ideas, and theories will 
                    remain untouched. Computer technology, in other words, has 
                    not yet come close to the printing press in its power to generate 
                    radical and substantive social, political, and religious thought. 
                    If the press was, as David Riesman called it, 'the gunpowder 
                    of the mind,' the computer, in its capacity to smooth over 
                    unsatisfactory institutions and ideas, is the talcum powder 
                    of the mind."  
                  Anybody 
                    who has implemented computer systems for trade unions or liberation 
                    movements will find Postman's views one-sided and excessively 
                    pessimistic. If nothing else, cy.Rev's unbridled enthusiasm 
                    for computer technology is a much needed counter-balance to 
                    the gloom-and-doom warnings of a Sale or a Postman. Where 
                    cy.Rev errs, it is in the way it too closely identifies with 
                    the "information revolution" hype promoted relentlessly 
                    in Wired. One of the more glaring examples is the kid gloves 
                    treatment of Robert Reich in Carl Davidson's review of "The 
                    Work of Nations: Preparing for 21st Century Capitalism." 
                  
              According 
                to Davidson, "Reich makes a convincing case that it is both 
                impossible and reactionary to try to prevent the globalization 
                of the market. Instead, he poses a strategic question: Rather 
                than trying to prevent low-wage, low-skill jobs from leaving the 
                United States, why don't we try a policy that would encourage 
                high-wage, high-skill jobs to come into the U.S., regardless of 
                the nationalities of the investors." While Reich believes 
                that a new generation of "symbolic analysts" will ease 
                transition away from smokestack industries, Davidson warns that 
                the biggest obstacle to this transition is the "savage inequalities" 
                in our school system. He quotes approvingly Reich's desire to 
                see "excellent public schools in every city and region and 
                ample financial help to young people who wanted to attend college 
                and substantial additional investments in universities, research 
                parks, airports and other facilities conducive to symbolic-analytic 
                work." More >> 
                
              |