I have two major
criticisms to offer Hawken. One is that his analysis needs to
be extended into the realm of social justice. The second is
that he lacks a political analysis about how to accomplish his
objectives. In the end he is left with moral persuasion as the
major vehicle to effect change.
Human beings are
clearly part of the human and world ecology. Among the hidden
costs of industrial economies are their affects on the lives
of working people. One of the enduring criticisms Karl Marx
made of capitalism was its inability to provide full employment.
Updating that point with Hawken's terminology would label capitalism
today as an immature ecosystem and would require an ecologically
mature (sustainable or restorative) economy to provide a secure
living for all who work in it. Along the same line, institutional
racism has created the social equivalent of a "labor toxic
waste dump" with a large pool of permanently unemployable
people whose lives are consigned to increasingly horrific levels
of violence and depravity.
Hawken only narrowly
focuses on what has been traditionally delineated as the environment;
he would be more consistent if social justice issues were treated
more thoroughly with the same analysis.
Hawken's
narrowness may reflect the traditional intellectual's alienation
from industry. Going back at least as far as Emerson, this tradition
partitions the world into "Nature" and "Man"
and offers up the Earth as an object for Man to subdue. This
framework clearly plays into the hands of the industrialists,
as this book so ably shows. By subsuming all human enterprise
under the ecology of the Earth, the alienation is overcome and
new creative solutions become immediately available. It is ironic
that Hawken, who really opens up this possibility, does not
seem to fully understand its implications. More
>>